General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Eff" Time Magazine
I guess the 500lbs of orange bile in a 200lb wrinkled bratwurst casing won't have to create fake Time Magazine covers, he'll just be able to hang this waste of ink in the Confederate White House in Florida.
It just frickin floors me. The waste of time and serious thought spent on this worthless dumbass is a symptom of insanity.
Look, you could write a 10,000 word essay on a pile of dog shit, but it's still dog shit.
I keep going back to my Navy days. It was 30 years of my life, so yeah, it was a significant part of my life.
One of my favorite things was Damage Control training. I was in a "in the rear with the gear" type of job. DC training broke up the monotony. It was, for me, the "adventure part". I actually was a member of several of my ships Damage Control Training Teams.
We drilled a LOT in Damage Control. When you stand on Deck, and get a 360 degree view of nothing but ocean for as far as the eye can see, you understand that your most important safety device is what you are standing on.
I never worried about the Russian, or Chinese "Sears Catalog" navy. Since WWII, they VAST majority of US Navy casualties have been from accidents. We worried about collisions with other ships, or reefs. We worried about Main Space fires. We worried about planes crashing on Flight Decks.
We practiced and drilled on evacuation and how to light off the Halon Flooding System. We trained on using "Tilly" to push the flaming wreckage of an aircraft over the side.
Know what we NEVER did? Interview the fire about its motive, plans, or policy positions.
See, a fire has one goal. To burn up and destroy EVERYTHING in its path until extinguished. And it shouldn't and doesn't matter if 41, 43, 45, or 47% of the Sailors are "rooting for the fire".
That's it. That's all a fire wants to do.
You're welcome Time Magazine, because I think I just saved you 9,998 words.
I get that you feel this is "news" that needs to be covered, because millions of voters have lost their FUCKING minds, but the story is not the psychopath, it's the mass psychosis.
Providing "coverage" to this moron, is like providing oxygen to a fire.
Ask yourself this Time. If your house was on fire, would you get out your notebook and interview the fire about its plans and policies, or would you do all you could to deprive it of oxygen?
Boomerproud
(7,991 posts)calimary
(81,616 posts)Ask yourself this Time. If your house was on fire, would you get out your notebook and interview the fire about its plans and policies, or would you do all you could to deprive it of oxygen?
KS Toronado
(17,500 posts)NonPC
(308 posts)This is why it's going away...
piddyprints
(14,651 posts)Every word. I dont think anyone could have said it better!
KPN
(15,684 posts)to the editor section.
niyad
(114,018 posts)brooklynite
(95,087 posts)WHY DOES THE MEDIA KEEP REPORTING ON WHAT DONALD TRUMP SAYS???
or...
WHY DOESN'T THE MEDIA TELL PEOPLE HOW BAD DONALD TRUMP IS BY REPORTING WHAT HE SAYS???
maxrandb
(15,413 posts)Ignore him.
calimary
(81,616 posts)3catwoman3
(24,152 posts)But, noooooooooo - they had to fawningly report on every breath he drew.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,601 posts)maxrandb
(15,413 posts)There are thousands of New York Real Estate developers that are 100 times richer, and have done a million more projects to build the capital of the world, but here comes this ignorant, bragadocious, crass, fraudulent criminal with a circus-clown bouffant hairdo, Earl Schieb spray-tan and a rolled-up sock in his pants, and the media flocks to him like moths to a flame.
Truth be told, if man is measured by his worth to mankind, we wouldn't even know who the fuck he is.
In a sane world, someone would mention his name, and we'd have to go to our web browser and type; "is Donnie Dipshit even still alive"?
That's how insignificant he should be.
damifino10
(29 posts)2016 was the bomb! All we saw for months was tRump. That election cycle isn't a pimple the current elections ass relating
to the amount of media coverage. Even when they are talking about other things, they run tRump's picture in the back ground.
It makes me fucking SICK!!!
Roy Rolling
(6,947 posts)They have one overriding concern: profits. But there are limits. You dont sell gasoline to an arsonist. Commercial media needs to turn down the advertising dollars, except with the explosion of Internet shows sucking up market revenue, theyre desperate.
Stop being desperate commercial media, and dont be the cause of the problem you report on your news show.
soldierant
(6,971 posts)I'm on the "Write as much as you can, as long as it's true and challenges him" side.
ShazzieB
(16,682 posts)I think those who think this article did TSF any favors missed the point of it!
unblock
(52,531 posts)Last edited Thu May 2, 2024, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)
today's media claims to be more interested in things like "balance" (ever notice this is invariably used as an excuse to give the right wing more of a voice, not the left wing?) and not taking sides.
but the constitution enshrines freedom of the press in the first amendment. why, so that the media business can make profits without government interference? no, the constitution is about the framework of a government, it's all about how the government should operate and how it is set up with divided duties and checks and balances and safeguards to prevent tyranny.
they remembered european monarchies, and specifically didn't want that for america, so the constitution has many features designed to prevent a tyrant from taking or exercising power.
*that* is why we have freedom of the press. so that they can be free to call our tyranny without fear of repercussions. congress is prohibited from arresting them for that or preventing published speech they disagree with.
i can't recall the last time i heard the media say anything like this may not be profitable for us as a business, but it's our patriotic duty to report.... maybe walter cronkite once said something like that. today's media instead sees it as their duty to amplify donnie's speech and give more airtime for his lies and hatred, enabling tyranny rather than opposing it.
donnie was an obvious tyrant and disaster in 2016, but the evidence by know is staggering. yet the media ho hums even a criminal trial, while more are pending, never mind that he's already been legally determined to be a rapist and defamer and fraudster.
when they announce a tornado, they tell people to seek shelter and stay safe. donnie is set to be far more destructive. where's the advice on how to stay safe? meh, let's just run a feature about how fascinating this guy is.
3catwoman3
(24,152 posts)unblock
(52,531 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,601 posts)calimary
(81,616 posts)Hugin
(33,229 posts)Takes a nautical theme. Its like watching a turd capsize. First of all, who cares? Secondly, its only the other side of the the same shit.
Goddessartist
(1,893 posts)Thank you! REC
KS Toronado
(17,500 posts)Then we'll talk about Fascism and where this country is headed and can we afford him back in power.
Granted I'll need to go buy one today to discover if TIME was praising him or warning us.
judesedit
(4,446 posts)KS Toronado
(17,500 posts)My crystal ball is blank, what's your ball showing? Always heard "Never judge a book by it's cover"
ShazzieB
(16,682 posts)No luck so far.
czarjak
(11,358 posts)Republicans built this crap. They voted W too.
ShazzieB
(16,682 posts)I'm glad Time decided to fully display his evil plans. Voters NEED to know what he wants to do so they can make a fully informed decision at the ballot box.
hay rick
(7,680 posts)Time Magazine is a throwback that reaches a pre-internet and cable TV demographic. It's worthwhile to get a digestible story on this menace out there. As for the media, generally, giving the fire oxygen- I put the non-stop coverage of Trump's trials and Truth Social posts into that category.
In Too Deep
(60 posts)I never understood the whole "don't cover him" narrative. The last thing you want to do is ignore what he's saying. That hides his true actions and I think a big reason Trump is doing as well as he is in the polls is directly tied to how many people aren't paying attention to the election.
It was the same in 2020 and 2016.
Trump was at his worst when the focus was on him. That's why the White House in 2020 stopped doing those daily COVID briefings - because he looked unhinged.
In 2016, when the focus was on Clinton, specifically her emails, Trump polled his best.
In fact, the last week of the campaign being nothing but Clinton and Comey likely won Trump the election. It was one of the only times he faded to the background. Kind of an out of sight, out of mind deal.
Trump doesn't get much out of negative coverage. And the Time interview has mostly been negative - not positive.
KPN
(15,684 posts)Times editors. Id put money on them printing it.
littlemissmartypants
(22,899 posts)It's days and the days of any readers it may have are way, way over.
It wouldn't surprise me if we found out that someone paid the publication to print what one of his cohort wrote.
Afterall, that political donation money won't spend itself.
Wild blueberry
(6,681 posts)Thank you!
By the way, Time magazine, you will be one of the first to get axed if there were to be a Stench dictatorship. No amount of Obeying in Advance and trying to get on his good side (pro tip: there isn't one) will help you then. It will be too late.
IrishAfricanAmerican
(3,831 posts)MSM is a lost cause as long as $$$ runs the show.
John1956PA
(2,683 posts)Thank you for your enlightening analogy pertaining to the uncompromising danger which a fire poses. Of country is indeed at the flashpoint of catastrophic conflagration.
Warpy
(111,494 posts)I said "eff TIME" in the undisguised profanity of a critical care nurse back in the 80s when they dumped Barbara Ehrenreich in favor of Rush Limbaugh. Haven't bought it since. Don't even look at the covers.
Fuck them sideways with a rusty chainsaw.
PennRalphie
(126 posts)Then Im not upset when someone else is upset that the media is talking about him. For me its easy. My blood pressure is great, my life remains wonderful. Just ignore all of it.
I focus on the good Biden is doing, and make sure everyone else knows it.
Baitball Blogger
(46,790 posts)pandr32
(11,646 posts)onecaliberal
(33,016 posts)Pay no mind. The magats don't buy this rag.
Hoosier_Progressiv
(36 posts)Magnificently worded in less than 1000 words.
LastDemocratInSC
(3,658 posts)The definition of a MAGA blivet.
3catwoman3
(24,152 posts)Than you for a moment of brilliant levity.
"Ask yourself this Time. If your house was on fire, would you get out your notebook and interview the fire about its plans and policies, or would you do all you could to deprive it of oxygen?"
The media should have ignored him from the moment he rode down that damn escalator. It's probably too late to ignore him now, but there are certainly other ways to deprive a fire of oxygen, one being smothering - cover him with negative attention so thick he can't counter it. There's certainly plenty of material available.
calimary
(81,616 posts)The Age of Orange Man.
Permanut
(5,724 posts)This tin can sailor veteran was a cook, but along with every other man on board, needed to know how to operate the doors and hoses.
I tell people we didn't have the option of calling 911.
Aristus
(66,537 posts)duckworth969
(656 posts)llmart
(15,573 posts)this one is superb! Yes, yes, and yes...send it to Time's editors. Honestly though, I don't know anybody who subscribes to or buys that rag, not even in my community of older people. My parents did back in the 50's but that was a whole other era when print media meant something.
maxrandb
(15,413 posts)They don't rely on subscriptions or sales, they are simply fodder for the MSM.
The aim is too drive the narrative. It's to get Morning Joe to talk about the article, then CNN can talk about MSNBC's discussion, MSNBC can then talk about CNN talking about MSNBC talking about CNN.
Soon, it becomes a "circle-jerk" with the American people as the "pivot-man".
Faux does the same, but their print media comes from the National Enquier and Globe.
It's nothing but the journalistic equivalent of mutual masturbation.
It would be like Walter Cronkite interviewing Peter Jennings, and pretending it's "news".
It just normalizes the abnormal,
summer_in_TX
(2,774 posts)The reporter kept digging with follow-up questions. Trumps dodging didnt work as well as usual. Hearing Trump say what he plans in his own words is important. It can be compared to Project 2025 plans, and verify his alignment with those. Video goes by too fast and the follow-up questions are never asked and answered
The title How Far Trump Would Go sure seems like a warning to me. Declarative.
Unlike the BS headlines of the NYT.
Ive downloaded and plan to use it in talking to people who may be persuadable.
liberalla
(9,281 posts)Thank you!