Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(130,178 posts)
Thu May 2, 2024, 05:38 AM May 2

Mar-a-Lago judge sets new hearing over 'grand jury matters' and materials in ongoing sealing and redaction battles

Source: Law & Crime

May 1st, 2024, 6:15 pm


The judge overseeing the Mar-a-Lago documents case has scheduled a hearing and status conference over several issues related to recent, sealed government filings as well as two long-sealed defense filings.

In a paperless order released late Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon set aside 90 minutes at 2 p.m. on May 8, exactly one week from today, “to discuss grand jury matters.”

“To the extent any non-parties to this proceeding have not yet had an opportunity to appear and be heard on the disclosure petition now transferred to this Court, the parties shall come prepared to discuss any additional procedures required,” the order reads.

Notably, the defense is not required to take part in the hearing.

Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/mar-a-lago-judge-sets-new-hearing-over-grand-jury-matters-and-materials-in-ongoing-sealing-and-redaction-battles-that-could-lead-to-release-of-long-secret-trump-motions/



Full headline: Mar-a-Lago judge sets new hearing over ‘grand jury matters’ and materials in ongoing sealing and redaction battles that could lead to release of long-secret Trump motions
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mar-a-Lago judge sets new hearing over 'grand jury matters' and materials in ongoing sealing and redaction battles (Original Post) BumRushDaShow May 2 OP
another decision, another delay Redleg May 2 #1
The attendance of the "defendants" is not required. That's different than the "defense" not being required. onenote May 2 #2
And the puppet dances as the puppet master pulls her strings. republianmushroom May 2 #3

Redleg

(5,864 posts)
1. another decision, another delay
Thu May 2, 2024, 07:50 AM
May 2

I am starting to think this judge is in the tank for Trump. The only other explanations are 1) poor time management, and 2) incompetence.

onenote

(42,885 posts)
2. The attendance of the "defendants" is not required. That's different than the "defense" not being required.
Thu May 2, 2024, 09:37 AM
May 2

All counsel are expected to participate. The statement in the order excusing the defendants' attendance simply means that Trump, Nauta, Oliveira themselves don't have to participate in the telephone hearing.

Pretty sloppy error from a website called "Law and Crime".

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Mar-a-Lago judge sets new...